Hong Kong and India will go back to China! Why should Nepal not withdraw from Sikkim, Darjeeling?

Kathmandu There has been 200 years of Sunglassi Treaty between Nepal and Britain. Two hundred years ago Nepalese Sheet immediately had to lose the land of Nepal's Machi and Mahakali innings before bowling before English. But in 1947, after the independence of India from Britain, the demand for Nepal to be the part of the land lost by Nepal has been in Nepal for decades. But this debate has not been able to rise up in national politics.

Phenindra Nepal, who was in the campaign, said the only slogan to be returned from the Sugauli treaty, said, "Why can China withdraw back to Hong Kong and why not India get back to Goa?" He should once again put the demands of the political parties in Nepal to return from the Sugauli Treaty. Tells

You are called Greater Nepal in the situation where Nepal is also weak in Nepal's internal nationality, is it not a phonomenon?

We did not seem to have anything to happen. We have used the 'Greater Nepal' campaign through the provisions that can be returned to our lost land.

What is the basis for Nepal to get lost in the treaty?

Soghuli is not such a point. But in the Sagouli Treaty, Nepal had to leave the land for ever to leave. However, on March 4, 1816, Nepal reached a tigree from Koshi to Gandaki in 1816, without reaching a Sunglassi Treaty signed on March 4, Nepal. The King of Nepal accepted the proposal on December 18, 18. It is also confirmed that the process of refunding a Sugauli treaty is not always for a year. In 1857, by helping Jung Bahadur to suppress the military rebel in Lucknow, India, the Witnesses witnessed a treaty in 1860, with a treaty in return from Tarai to Tarai.

After helping the British to rebel against the British rebel, Nepal found some parts of the world, what is the matter with us now that the British is doing so? What policy should we take to recover lost land?

For this, there should be consensus between political parties within Nepal. This thread should be raised in the morning. Be the subject of national debate. If millions of people are raising this issue from the public level, there should be debate in the government and the house too. But there is no debate on where to be debated. The ruling parties, who talked about nationalism, used to argue within their own party, to discuss discussions in the government, to run in the house. Nobody escaped from that debate. After that debate, India did not want to be angry. But unfortunately, in the leadership class of Nepal, there is a lot of interest in India's interest in Nepal than Nepal.

Why do not you get power, and why the ruling parties could not lift Greater Nepal agenda?

It is strange that the common Nepali people are ready to fight for nationality and to withdraw their lost land. But the agenda of state-run parties has not achieved this agenda by being unprofessional.

We have submitted a memorandum to Subhash Chandra Nemang, often before our frontier. We heard that 601 MPs should be discussed about withdrawal of land lost in Sugauli treaty. But they are afraid to discuss. They had to dare That is why we can not say that we can not.

China should withdraw Hong Kong withdrawal, Goa should not be able to withdraw back to India, which may take Macau back to China. Japan also asks for a land back to Russia. Timor has become independent as the colonies of Indonesia. There are many examples. Therefore, there are many examples of the world that the land is not always able to capture. But in our country, the one who wants to ask is not asking for it. In Nepali scriptures, it seems like the wings were wrapped up with jars. It is like a tear before the heat. The Nepali people should now force them to stir up.

Share on Google Plus

About Kathmandu Post

This is a short description in the author block about the author. You edit it by entering text in the "Biographical Info" field in the user admin panel.